Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Oracle Versions


2 replies to this topic

#1 Jim

Jim

    Advanced

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 52 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 03 September 2008 - 10:02 AM

A client of ours is requesting an Oracle upgrade from 9.2.0.6 to 9.2.0.7 or possibly 9.2.0.8, due to some Oracle factor external to ProIV (archiving or logging related), as recommended by Oracle. The kernel in use is v5.5 under Win Server 2003 and the ProIV Clients are v5.6.7.0 running on Win XP/Vista. Has anyone any experience of Oracle 9.2.0.7/9.2.0.8 - any red flags to be aware of? Thanks.

#2 kinhell

kinhell

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts

Posted 04 September 2008 - 01:31 PM

A client of ours is requesting an Oracle upgrade from 9.2.0.6 to 9.2.0.7 or possibly 9.2.0.8, due to some Oracle factor external to ProIV (archiving or logging related), as recommended by Oracle. The kernel in use is v5.5 under Win Server 2003 and the ProIV Clients are v5.6.7.0 running on Win XP/Vista. Has anyone any experience of Oracle 9.2.0.7/9.2.0.8 - any red flags to be aware of? Thanks.



Its just a patch so shouldn't be a problem. You can always reverse the patch if you have any issues.

#3 kinhell

kinhell

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts

Posted 04 September 2008 - 01:35 PM

A client of ours is requesting an Oracle upgrade from 9.2.0.6 to 9.2.0.7 or possibly 9.2.0.8, due to some Oracle factor external to ProIV (archiving or logging related), as recommended by Oracle. The kernel in use is v5.5 under Win Server 2003 and the ProIV Clients are v5.6.7.0 running on Win XP/Vista. Has anyone any experience of Oracle 9.2.0.7/9.2.0.8 - any red flags to be aware of? Thanks.



Its just a patch so shouldn't be a problem. You can always reverse the patch if you have any issues.



Reply to this topic



  


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users