Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Commit Points


17 replies to this topic

#16 Shaun Rudland

Shaun Rudland

    Expert

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 165 posts
  • Location:Queensland, Australia

Posted 30 September 2000 - 11:16 PM

If reading from a list of rows that could be changing
underneath you is not a data integrity issue, then I don't
know what is !!
PRO-IV free for 385 Days B)

#17 Shaun Rudland

Shaun Rudland

    Expert

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 165 posts
  • Location:Queensland, Australia

Posted 30 September 2000 - 11:35 PM

... but you're right; your application, your call.

I'll shut-up now.
PRO-IV free for 385 Days B)

#18 Dan Shannon

Dan Shannon

    ProIV Guru

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 374 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 30 September 2000 - 11:50 PM

It seems to me that as long as you re-check the SELECT conditions in ARNE in change mode, then nearly everything is OK (the exception is that you miss any rows which have met the conditions since the cursor was originally established).

So it's all about the balance of risk and cost against performance and functionality, the usual project manager's nightmare.

Of course, in an ideal world, there'd be infinite resources, infinite technical knowhow, and no deadlines... and in any case in an ideal world we'd probably all convert our apps into something other than PRO-IV ;)

Dan Shannon
GREYCELL SYSTEMS



Reply to this topic



  


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users